![]() |
||
|
|
Article in support of Robert's reduced sentence I have known many parents of children with cerebral palsy. I know the unique bond they share with their child, how they read their childs eyes, how they feel their pain. They must make decisions regarding every aspect of their childs life. This includes agreeing to surgery, to medication, to therapy, to the childs way of sitting, of eating, of sleeping. The empathy that develops is awesome and it means empathy for their childs pain as well as their joy. When the relationship is strongest, the strengths, the sensitivities, the vulnerabilities, and sadly, the weaknesses, of the parent dictate what the childs life will be. After thirty years of interacting with such families, I realize I can never truly understand the dynamics between these parents and their offspring. How can a judicial system possibly apply a rigid mandatory ruling to an event arising within this relationship? I listen most attentively to the argument expressed by many persons with disabilities and their organizations regarding the slippery slope we are descending if we offer compassion to Robert Latimer. This and other arguments against reducing Roberts sentence are reflected in the comments of our editors. Counter arguments are ably presented on [this website] by Professor Rudy Krutzen, retired from the University of Saskatchewan. I will comment on but one argument, that of the slippery slope, for it concerns me the most. I acknowledge the strong need for vigilance and advocacy to protect those with disabilities against any devaluating of their lives. This, however, does not prevent me from worrying about the equally dangerous slippery slope associated with mandatory sentences and class incarceration protocols preventing judges and juries from using their discretion based on the knowledge they gain through the trial process. I must vehemently reject simplistic "one-size-fits-all- solutions". They put all individual rights at risk. I urge our readers to carefully consider the Latimer family "story". In my letters to members of parliament, I have proposed two things : Compassion for Robert
through a reduced sentence, with no need for maximum security detention
He drove himself to prison! Shirley McNaughton
Ph.D., Member of the Order of Canada |
|